[f_minor] administrivia: message sizes

[maryellen jensen]

Hejsan Karl, 

 It is indeed unfortunate, that word "rejected". One takes it personally when of course that is not at all the case. I am surprised that any images at all have come through F Minor - I thought that attachments were prohibited except for 'hyperlinks' until that woman sent a photo of Gould's gravestone and so I, like Bob Merkin, dared follow suit. I don't know what to say about the situation except that on the one hand it would be great to be able to send in 'attachments' but on the other hand I have noticed that on the 'public-collective' face of the new F Minor one hasn't even the luxury of a personal typeface...

Mary Jensen

> Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 21:18:53 +0000
> From: karl at freefriends.org
> To: f_minor at glenngould.org
> Subject: [f_minor] administrivia: message sizes
> 
> If everyone is happy with arbitrarily-large attachments I'm fine with
> allowing them.  (It doesn't matter to me personally.)  However, based on
> past experience with sending large images through, I doubted that was
> the case.  I wish mailman used a less-loaded term than "reject" :).
> 
> Right now the limit for a single message is around 100-150k.
> 
> karl
> 
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://ff0.org/pipermail/f_minor/attachments/20100710/bf3bc19d/attachment.html>